create2connect

management consultancy and leadership development
creating sustainable transformations

Home Blog

Wibo's blog

create2connect likes to share with others: insights, experiences, opinions, inspirations. Below you can find our weblog, with regular new subjects.

Nanotechnology and the precautionary principle: innovation stopped

Over the last two years I was involved in a broad dialogue on the effect of the introduction of nanotechnology in society. The dialogue (organized by an independent Committee: www.nanopodium.nl) succeeded in providing a lot of good information to the Dutch citizens: what is nanotechnology, how does it work, what are possibilities and risks of its use? Conclusion: let's move forward in a responsible manner.
Again in this discussin it became clear to me how easily such a dialogue is overwhelmed by the risks and fears of a new technology. In 1992 at the Earth Summit in Rio the precautionary principle was formulated: "lack of full scientific evidence shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation". Since then, the principle has been used as a strong argument for an allmost brake on technological innovation. The "better safe than sorry" maxim rules: no innovation can be used unless scientifically proven to be completely harmless.  I have seen that happening under my eyes during my earlier involvement in the debates on genetic modification.
The point is however that we can only learn the full possibilities and risks of an innovation by its use on a wider scale. When the first cars were used people were afraid of explosions of the motor and the harm that would do to the drivers. Nobody thought of wide scale traffic jams.  A strictly used precautionary principle makes it impossible to learn what we can do or shoudn't by using a new technology. You cannot discern that in a laboratory or by scientific research alone.
Is there an alternative? Can we as a modern pluralistic society make collective choice on technology and innnovation? Can we as a global society choose some innovations over others? Surprisingly enough Kevin Kelly shows in his book What Technology Wants that the Amish (not a people know for its progressiveness) have found a way to judge technology for its congruence with their values by taking time to test them and research them for their contribution to their way of life.
It leads Kelly to the plea for another principle that replaces the precautionary one: the Proactionary Principle. That is a conscious and continuous engagement with innovation and technology with the aid of five "proactions": anticipation;  continual assessment;  prioritization of risks, including natural ones; rapid correction of harm; not prohibition but redirection.This gives us a broader and much more self-assuredprinciple for the steering of the inevitable  progress of technology. We will have to embrace technology within our human domain. And we will have to "learn" them (i.e. the innovations) what we want from them.
It also gives perspective on what Kelly calls, following the great educatar and social activist Ivan Illich, "convivial tools": tools that "enlarge the contribution (to a good and just society, WK) of autonomous individuals and primary groups." Kelly: "I am convinced that conviviality resides (…) in the job assignment, in the context, in the expression we construct for the technology".
And that is a good start for the future of nanotechnology in society. We, as a society, will make the future of nanotechnology ourselves. Without a brake but proactive!

 

The geography of the financial crisis

Back in the seventies I studied social and economic geography. I’m still impressed by one of the first articles I then read about landscape and space in the USA and how the concept of space influenced the thinking of American immigrants in an urge to explore and to innovate (though with an unscrupulousness that killed many native Americans!).  The article forever changed my view on the world: looking and thinking from a spatial perspective. One of my then heroes in the field was the geographer David Harvey, who made the change from a classical empirical scientist to a policital-economic oriented geographer, strongly inspired by Karl Marx’ world view. Dogmatic often, but always full of new insights.

Surprisingly enough I recently came across a new book of him, The Enigma of Capital and the Crisis of Capitalism. In a well written story he shows how capital flows shaped the geography of our financial-economic crisis. The first signals of this crisis became visible in growing number of house evictions in some American states. And within two years the geography of the crisis was visible all over the world. Last January I was in the North Italian city of Dommodossola. In the new shopping mall, thriving a few years ago, now only the big supermarket was open. All other, smaller shops were closed, a sign of regional economic depression.

Harvey succeeds to connect a sharp analysis of the dynamics of capitalism to the visible geography of human activities, in a nuanced and convincing way he makes clear what the effects of the crisis are for ordinary people and the environment. The unstoppable competition for cheap labor and technology, the driving force of far too cheap housing loans for already over credited consumers. A fascinating spectacle of again and again surmounting the obstacles for capital accumulation and entrepreneurship. Industrial development at the expense though of forests and nature.

Where Harvey in earlier books most of the time ended in a pessimistic tone because of the inescapable nature of capitalism, this time he shows more of the possibilities to steer the force of capitalism in a good direction. For a short moment he dreams of the return of the notion of “communism” as a signal of hope. That won’t be the case he also acknowledges. But he nevertheless shows how many possibilities people have to create together a new innovative sustainable and social future. I recommend reading this book, it sharpens your thinking!

 

Capitalism: the best economic system we have!

Sometimes a very readable, and exiting book falls into your hands. And that is 23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism from the Korean Cambridge professor Ha-Joon Chang for sure. In a clear way he demystifies the free market, shareholder capitalism and the idea that government should take its hands off the economy. An insightful book, that makes you think! Because where in the world do you hear a reasonable voice (he is still in favor of capitalism) that argues for a good welfare state and for a sound reconstruction of the world economy. Chang formulates eight principles for a reasonable economic future. Some of which I find very useful.

First the idea that we shouldn’t build the economy on the pursuit of material self-interest, but on enlightened self-interest. Let’s also reward and take into account what we do for others. Which also would mean to design organisations in such a way that they reward trust, solidarity, honesty and cooperation between people.

Secondly, we should take much more serious “the making of things”. The economy will never be build on knowledge alone, but as much on industrial products. Who doesn’t believe that should read the wonderful book of Brian Arthur, The Nature of Technology. He shows that all our technology and vis-à-vis our knowledge is based on the capturing of effects that exist in nature.

And finally, we need a big and active state. To care for a broad spectrum of education, for sound regulation of the financial system and a innovative industrial policy. As a broad public base for a dynamic economy. We cannot do without. A thriving capitalism neither!

 

The (im)possibility of sustainable cities

Sometimes reading a book feel like a personal history. That happened to me when reading Jeb Brugmann's Welcome to the Urban Revolution, where I could trace my history from being a student of human geography, city planning and political science and a lifelong interest in facilitating strategic change as an organizational consultant. In a comprehensive book he shows how  large metropoles, where today more than half of the world population lives, define the dynamics of globalisation. Core of his message: cities are no longer islands in itself, but
>>>
 

Obama's leadership one year after

Just two weeks ago Obama seemed infallible succesful: the new healt care reform would be the final piece of the first year of his presidency. One week later his presidency lies in ruins. At least if we - in both cases - believe the media. Is it really that simple?
Looking back at the last year one thing stands out for me: Obama turned out to be a president that creates space and gives direction. He didn't show up as the knots chopping cowbiy-CEO of the USA, but listens to arguments and makes sound asessments. Striking is also the way

>>>
 
Pagina 1 van 3
Deel deze pagina
Facebook Twitter Linkedin

Resources

Books

Bo Burlingham (200), Small Giants. Companies That Choose to BE Great Instead of Big
Waarom klein blijven groot kan zijn voor een onderneming. En waarom visie de beslissende factor is. Meer...

Films

Coach Carter
Coach Carter is een prachtige film over een coach die op een moeilijke middelbare school in een arme Amerikaanse buurt het basketballteam onder zijn hoede neemt. En uiteindelijk de leerlingen verbiedt te spelen totdat hun schoolresultaten in orde zijn. Maar meer nog laat de film zien door welke dalen en leerprocessen een leider moet gaan.
More...

Contact us

Click here to contact us.
create2connect
Van Speijkstraat 64-2
1057 HE Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Mobile: +31 6 22705153